tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819711698688655785.post890676916949182602..comments2023-10-30T00:44:05.942-07:00Comments on Governing through Crime: London CallingJonathan Simonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15217567476776700363noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819711698688655785.post-76760986066566124462012-07-24T04:02:31.185-07:002012-07-24T04:02:31.185-07:00Great post as ever Jonathan. You’re quite right in...Great post as ever Jonathan. You’re quite right in your implication that we Brits already seem to have nailed our first gold medal (marathon complaining). I have nothing critical to say about your observations – they seem spot on to me. I just wanted to add a little bit of background – which I know you’ll be very familiar with – to the story about G4S.<br /><br />Crucially, it arrives at an interesting time in the politics of policing in England. It is interesting for a number of reasons. First, the government is in the midst of severe public sector cuts and has made it clear that the police service should be anything but immune. This makes the police service understandably both nervous and, some of the time, angry. One consequence of the cuts has been that questions around privatization or contracting out have been becoming increasingly visible, and this itself is a significant part of the backdrop to the G4S scandal. (Already a number of senior figures have been rethinking their stance on private sector involvement in policing.<br /><br />Second, and more broadly and unusually, government has also been positioning itself for a major fight with the police service for some time now. The past two decades have seen something of a competition between the two main political parties here to see who can stay closest to the cops. All this ended with the arrival of the new coalition government in 2010. Their agenda, it soon became clear, was to institute some significant changes in what they styled as ‘the last great unreformed public service’. In addition to the financial cuts, they have reformed governance structures, have imposed an unpopular choice on the police service as the head of the independent inspectorate, and have set about attempting to change officers’ employment contracts (and their pensions in particular). The consequence has been argument upon argument, and a severe cooling of relations. It was in the midst of this that G4S stumbled. <br /><br />Thus we find ourselves in the midst of the biggest peacetime security operation for who knows how long (quite possibly ever?), the main private security contractor is unable to deliver on contract, and there is no choice for the government but to have the police and the army, both of which are losing plenty of staff, come in to cover the shortfall. With the Games only days away now, I suspect this will go quiet for a little while as the medals are won and lost. But the story is not going to go away. The consequences for G4S will not be good, and will only get worse if anything really problematic occurs. The police and armed services now have public sympathy on their side. Which only leaves government? It is too early to tell how this will play out for the coalition, but there must inevitably be some bumpy times ahead I think. One way or the other an interesting criminal justice story is being played out across the front pages. <br /><br />And, just in case you thought I failed to respond to the most obviously British bit of the story – it’s sunny in London today!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02634223954169504239noreply@blogger.com